Author: Graham Banks
Date: 19:35:03 01/18/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2006 at 22:18:11, robert flesher wrote: >Let me say I agree with both sides, however it is a rash assumptions once again >that lead to dispute. So I will try a little experiment. Everyone thinks these >are book losses? where is the proof? If it is not the exact same game then I say >it is fair game! However, I will manually force Hiarcs to play the opposite side >of the games that it won and see what happens! Then what will people say if >hiarcs wins? Has anyone even bothered to look at the brilliant attacks? No only >statistically bullshit, I grow tired of this. I could care less for the results, >I play to watch and learn chess, others here seem to only care about scores. Like I said Robert, for most of us computer chess is a hobby. Just do things the way you want to and don't worry about what others have to say. You will always get those who agree and those who disagree with the validity of what you do, just as any of us do with our testing preferences. You won't be able to please everybody, no matter what you do. Don't let it get you down. Regards, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.