Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: but hey , don't take my word for it...

Author: Günther Simon

Date: 02:56:55 01/20/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 20, 2006 at 05:51:32, Martin Andersen2 wrote:

>On January 20, 2006 at 05:28:47, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>
>
>>I question that Rybka is already proven the strongest engine today. Then people
>>tell me to look at CEGT where that has been proven... This was a few days ago
>>here in CCC. I must object to such sort of hybris. The truth is that we dont
>>have statistical methods for making such claims. Even after 700 or maybe over
>>1000 games the significance is not so sure and if you look at the +/- boundaries
>>of the so called Elo results then you still have overlappings and you cant say
>>that Rybka is the clear first.
>
>Rybka 1.0 beta 64 bit 2859 +-21
>Deep shredder 9 2CPU 2804 +-17
>
>So Rybka's number 1 spot cannot be touched. You are wrong.
>
>Martin.

It is even worse ;) You compared 1 cpu vs. 2 cpus rating...

Guenther



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.