Author: Mariaclara Benedicto
Date: 05:29:02 01/27/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2006 at 07:49:23, Tord Romstad wrote: >On January 27, 2006 at 06:32:29, Antonio Redael wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Glaurung 102 seems to be a rather strong free engine. Are there any results? > hi, cant wait to set it up vs wildcat, naum, slowchess and prodeo. thanks whatever >Hi Antonio, > >Thanks for your interest. I am not aware of any results for Glaurung 1.0.2, >but there are plenty of results for the almost identical 1.0.1. The strength >seems to be on roughly the same level as Naum, WildCat, Ruffian, Gandalf, >SlowChess and ProDeo. I am too lazy to locate all the many test results I >have seen, but you can have a look at the CEGT and UEL rating lists: > >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/cegtrating4040best.html >http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lefouduroi/tournois/uci/uel_rating.htm > >As you can see, it is not close to the top programs, but hey, it's free. :-) > >>What about Tablebase settings? > >Tablebases are not supported, and probably never will be. Glaurung is >released under the GNU Public License, which is not compatible with the >Nalimov EGTB code. > >Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.