Author: Tony Nichols
Date: 06:24:05 01/30/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2006 at 08:29:50, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 30, 2006 at 08:04:45, Tony Nichols wrote: > >>On January 30, 2006 at 06:55:00, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>---- IF Rybka is much a better chessplayer despite its still existing >>>weaknesses? We talk about Kramnik, but this is ridiculous because Kramnik didnt >>>even win against Fritz! I see a single opponent for Rybka in the coming World >>>Championship and that is Hydra. Go! Al(o)i(s) Hydra vs Vas(ik) Rybka! I read >>>about Anand. Hahahahaha! He already lost against Rebel, almost ten years ago. I >>>admit that Bobby Fischer is the exception. He has a positive score against the >>>machines. But then, I have a positive score too - against Fritz! >> >> This is a very big "IF". Also, Kramnik did not lose the match against Fritz. >>Computers playing computers is not interesting for many chess fans. In fact, >>Computers playing top GM's is not very interesting. The same scenario is played >>out in almost everygame. The GM gets a good position and the only suspense is if >>he will miss a tactic. > >I do not think that it is so simple. >Adams did not get good positions in his match against hydra. > >Uri Hello Uri, I agree. He did get reasonable positions from the opening and then was outplayed. In other matches I think my statement still holds true. Regards Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.