Author: Howard Exner
Date: 04:58:00 04/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 1999 at 11:11:30, Tony Hedlund wrote: >On April 07, 1999 at 04:06:58, Paulo Soares wrote: > >>The Eric Hallsworth's list takes in account the games of >>the SSDF, other games compxcomp, and games between human >>and computers. >>Considering that the games of the SSDF are the great majority >>of the games compxcomp in his list, seems reasonable to write >>that the programs who has greater difference in ELO between >>the two lists, are the best ones against humans. >>Below the probable better programs against humans(remember >>Screder 3.0 and Rebel 10 are not in SSDF list. >> >> >>Paulo Soares, from Brazil > >Eric also adds games with shorter time controls then we have. > >Tony The Hallsworth list also fails to give the exact events that the ratings are drawn upon. This should be a standard, just like countries do when they rate their players. Plus that list does not give the match scores, nor does it provide games for download. Consumer report articles that rank certain products always provide specific details about how the products were tested. Consumers today are a bit leary about just accepting a claim without data to back that claim up.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.