Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Relations between Eric Hallsworth's list e SSDF list.

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 14:28:29 04/08/99

Go up one level in this thread


On April 07, 1999 at 06:09:37, Jouni Uski wrote:

>On April 07, 1999 at 04:06:58, Paulo Soares wrote:
>
>>The  Eric Hallsworth's list takes in account the games of
>>the SSDF, other games compxcomp, and games between human
>>and computers.
>>Considering that the games of the SSDF are the great majority
>>of the games compxcomp in his list, seems reasonable to write
>>that the programs who has greater difference in ELO between
>>the two lists, are the best ones against humans.
>>Below the probable better programs against humans(remember
>>Screder 3.0 and Rebel 10 are not in SSDF list.
>>
>>   Program       ELO ERIC-ELO SSDF
>>
>>1. Hiarcs7................ 62
>>1. Nimzo98................ 62
>>3. Mchess Pro 8.0......... 58
>>4. Hiarcs 6.0............. 48
>>5. Genius 5............... 44
>>6. Junior 5.0............. 38
>>7. Rebel 9.0.............. 35
>>8. Fritz5.32.............. 34
>>9. Screder 2.0............ 33
>>10.Chessmaster 6000....... 27
>>11.Nimzo 99............... 26
>>12.Fritz 5.0.............. 25
>>
>>Paulo Soares, from Brazil
>
>Interesting list. But I think, that number of games against humans in SS
>list is very minimal. At least I haven't heard about ANY human tournaments
>for a while.


I think there was a tournament not too long ago in Spain.  It included about 3
of the top programs against several Spanish masters.  The computers were
essentially unbeatable.
Jim Walker



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.