Author: Günther Simon
Date: 04:34:19 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2006 at 23:37:36, Peter Skinner wrote: >On February 11, 2006 at 23:27:09, George Speight wrote: > >> >>Same here Tom. I agree with you 100%. I test because i enjoy it, and hope it >>will be something others can look at and enjoy. I think all the testers should >>be commended, for their results under diff. test conditions can help others a >>lot in deciding engine downloads and/or purchases. Its the first thing i look at >>each day, and i doubt im the only one. My question would be exactly what he >>wants the damn thing to turn into. I will be the first to admit there has >>probably been an overabundance of Rybka posts, but that is no reason to take a >>cheap shot at Vas. He has done nothing but provide us with a great program and a >>lot of excitement. And if that wasnt a cheap shot at Vas, i would certainly hate >>to see one that was. Very disappointing, to say the least. If he gets full >>moderator backing on what he spouted, I would be floored. Regards, George > >Actually it is not a shot at Vas at all. > >If he can get a few minions to pay for his beta program, fix the bugs they >report and make even more money off it then all the power to him. > >By no means was that a cheap shot at Vas... > >Peter No one must test the betas, no one paid for the betas and no one must send bug reports for not paid betas. Everyone simply paid for the release of a future version and no one was forced to do so. Saying it was no 'cheap' shot doesn't make your strange posting any better... it just remains an insult to the customers of Rybka and Vasik Raijlich, one way or the other.(calling customers 'minions' adds another insult to your original post) There is really no need to put any words in your mouth, those words already had left your mouth. Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.