Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 10:20:00 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 13:03:26, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 12, 2006 at 12:02:43, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On February 12, 2006 at 11:01:56, Torstein Hall wrote: >> >>>I for one simply want to have the strongest engine possuble, and by the way its >>>not more bugs in the latest release of Rybka than in most Chessbase programs! >>>With Rybka at least the bugs are fixed and the author are open about it. >> >>Why compare Rybka to Chessbase products? >> >>One is "beta".. the other isn't. > >It could be easily the opposite if chessbase decide to call their product beta >when vasik could call his products with a different name that does not include >the word beta. > >I wonder why do you care about the name. > >Uri It is not really the name that I care about, but rather the practice that is being exhibited. Nothing more. And it really doesn't have anything to do with Rybka. It is just a good example of it. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.