Author: Albert Silver
Date: 14:28:31 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
>>>You are hardly "new" Sarah, and you know it. >>> >>>Which would you rather be called? Sherry Windsor? Sarah Reynolds? >>> >>>If your post isn't useless, please explain how it is. >>> >>>You make a blanket statement, provide no proof for your statement.. typical.. >>> >>>Peter >> >> Now you are getting even more rediculous then I thought possible even for you. >>The title of my post who "How strong is Hiarcs" this is a question not a >>statement. Why should I not proof for a Question? Then in the content of the >>post I said it "seems to me that rykba is very strong and is stronger then >>rykba" this is a subjective feeling, > >You made the statement with the content of the post. Peter made no mention of >the header. >"This program to me seems stronger then Rykba, it plays a mean game of chess and >doesn't give the human player any chances at all, great program i think." Still, you must admit it is quite a turnaround from the initial "Hiarcs Sucks" statement. ;-) Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.