Author: stuart taylor
Date: 18:51:41 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 13:14:02, Peter Eizenhammer wrote: >On February 12, 2006 at 06:42:58, stuart taylor wrote: >>Indeed I was interested in UNreasonable timings too! >>OK but would it then be much much better after another year, by the rate Vasik >>is going? (Or would it take waiting for computers to work X100 quicker? [Or even >>X10-X20, because that might be enough to fit in some time-consuming searches, >>but which are nevertheless very effective, but would slow things down too much >>at present cpu speeds] > >based on your postings in general i still guess that you wait for the >64 piece tablebases, so that you can start an effective training. >Well, live long and prosper ... That might be atleast 5000 elo. or even infinity (except against itself) I was just saying about it being even better than now. S.Taylor > >>This question can be understood better by people more >>experienced in chess programming, probably > >I really dont think so :-) > >Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.