Author: Telmo C. Escobar
Date: 22:47:47 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 13:32:33, Peter Skinner wrote: >This is nothing more than a flagrant attempt in polling users about possible >commercial payment possibilities for your program, and as such I am removing the >thread. > >As per the charter: > >Once a member gains access to the message board, he may read all messages and >post new or response messages with the proviso that these new or response >messages: > > 1. Are, within reason, on the topic of computer chess > 2. Are not abusive in nature > 3. Do not contain personal and/or libelous attacks on others > 4. Are not flagrant commercial exhortations > 5. Are not of questionable legal status. > >What about rule #4 do you not understand? > >Peter I don't agree with your interpretation of Vasik's posting. That is, his message -IMHO- is not a "flagrant commercial exhortation". While his motivation for writing seems to be indeed commercial, his questions make sense, are interesting, and could even be useful for other programmers. Telmo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.