Author: Ray Banks
Date: 23:25:57 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2006 at 00:29:29, Graham Banks wrote: >Hello Heinz, > >history has nothing to do with it. >CEGT do a fine job and we have never stated otherwise. >Just because CCRL is based on slower time controls due to benchmarking to more >modern hardware does not detract from the work that CEGT does. >As we've said all along, all rating lists just add to the big picture. >We do not see ourselves competing with CEGT and I hope that you don't see CEGT >as competing with us. > >Regards, Graham. Yes, nothing I said was in any way meant as a criticism of CEGT. CEGT do a brilliant job, everyone knows that including us. And as Graham says, all we're doing is adding to the big picture, and I hope there is no sense of "competition" between ANY of the ratings lists. That would be sad.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.