Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 12:18:08 02/22/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2006 at 10:42:47, Thomas Gaksch wrote: >34 euro is very cheap for the new "pawn-pusher-turbo". until now no other >programmer was able to write such a great "pawn-pusher" code. one problem is of >course, that the most chess programmers did not have the chess playing skills to >figure out what is important to implement a "perfect" code for passed pawns. i >think you are a great chess player. are you able to tell us an algorithm for >passed pawns? or algorithm for other important evaluations. >by the way rybka is also an great searcher and has other very good evaluations. Yes, but this is NOT because Vasik is a good chessplayer but more because he's a good programmer. >it is worth every cent. and in 4 games every program can lose. Do you therefore deny the existence of losing a tournament or are you saying that such a loss isnt important? I dont get the meaning of such trivial statements. What is your motivation in that topic? I'm sure we could come on talking terms if you tried to present your ideas conclusively. Look, I was refering to a _loss_ of a famous program and you didnt like it or what is your point? DO you want to reform the meaning of language and its expressions? You must not answer but then please consider my actual objections and questions. > >thomas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.