Author: Charles Wane
Date: 07:55:39 02/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2006 at 10:44:28, Tony Thomas Karippa wrote: >On February 26, 2006 at 10:36:25, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On February 26, 2006 at 10:23:46, Charles Wane wrote: >> >>> Peter this is crazy, surely you are more intelligent then this? Are you telling >>>me that sherry was banned cause she had a negative opinion about a program but >>>did not back it up with facts??? You can't be serious here. You appear to be >>>saying that the term "sucks" in itself was not bad, but the fact that Sherry did >>>not provide proof. This is on a whole new level of adsurdity . I think half the >>>post here should be deleted if that's your criteria for banning people. No way >>>you can label "Hiarcs sucks" as a personal attack. I do believe people have a >>>Right to express a strong opinion, with or without proof. Sorry I just can't buy >>>this as a reason for you deleting Sherry's post. >>>A monkey could moderate better then that! >Peter is almost as good as the monkey, if not better. By the way I also have >every reason to believe you are Sherry, unless you wandered in to the archives >and read the stuff or Sherry is your imaginary online girlfriend. Well think about this sir? What if you are wrong?, You nor anyonelse should not be making such an accusion based on belief only without proof, unless you don't care if you offend a stranger unjustly.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.