Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 06:09:00 02/28/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2006 at 08:52:53, Kenny Dail wrote: >Is this better than the: > Glaurung 0.1.5 ---> Glaurung Mainz ---> Glaurung 1.0.2 ---> Glaurung CCT8 >naming convention? I may get confused as to which one is current. :) That's hardly the same thing, but I get your point. I suppose the easiest rule is simply that the current version is always the one which is available from my Web site. Besides, it wouldn't have looked quite as bad if you had included all the public versions in your list. :-) Glaurung 0.1.2 -> Glaurung 0.1.3 -> Glaurung 0.1.4 -> Glaurung 0.1.5 -> Glaurung 0.1.6 -> Glaurung 0.2.0 -> Glaurung 0.2.1 -> Glaurung 0.2.3 -> Glaurung 0.2.4 -> Glaurung Mainz -> Glaurung 1.0 -> Glaurung 1.0.1 -> Glaurung 1.0.2 -> Glaurung CCT8. Except for Glaurung Mainz and Glaurung CCT8 it isn't that bad, is it? :-) And Glaurung CCT8 will not be usable at all except for those few people who has a dual, of course. For most practical purposes, Glaurung 1.0.2 is still the current version, and will remain so for some time. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.