Author: blass uri
Date: 10:03:57 04/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 1999 at 07:52:36, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >On April 17, 1999 at 07:17:37, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On April 16, 1999 at 00:03:28, Paulo Soares wrote: >> >>>On April 15, 1999 at 18:18:50, Peter McKenzie wrote: >>> >>>>The Nolot test suite is a set of 11 very hard test positions, with the 11th >>>>position being one of the easier ones. I tried it on lambchop last night, chop >>>>managed to solve it in about 3000sec (50min) on my 133mhz Pentium with 32mb RAM. >>>> The solution was found at ply 11. How do other programs go on this one? >>>> >>>>r1b3k1/p2p1nP1/2pqr1Rp/1p2p2P/2B1PnQ1/1P6/P1PP4/1K4R1 w - - >>>>Solution: Rxh6 >>>> >>>> >>>>cheers, >>>>Peter >>> >>> >>>Peter, >>> >>> All engines in a PII-300 HT=32Mb. Crafty16.6 runs >>>as a Fritz engine! Crafty runs with a logo released by >>>Massimo Gattari(see post number 48781). >>> >>>If you want the new engine with logo please send me e-mail. >>> Time(sec) Depth Score >>> >>> Genius6 511 9 -1.87 >>> Crafty16.6 600 13 -1.98 >>> Fritz5.32 >1500 >>> Hiarcs7.01 >1500 >>> >>>Regards, >>> >>>Paulo Soares >> >>Fritz5.16 time:22:53=1373 seconds >>depth:15/38 >>score of Rxh6 -0.50 >> >>Fritz5.16 used 64Mbytes hash tables under windows95 P200MMX >> >>Maybe Fritz5.16 is better than Fritz5.32 > >You forgot to specify : FOR THAT POSITION > >But the real challenge for chess program now is : "find a good move where >there's 'nothing' to find" It is not clear that Fritz5.32 is better than Fritz5.16 in games I read that Fritz5.32 is winning Fritz5.16 in the nunn match but does not win Fritz5.16 when both programs are using normal books. I saw mistakes that Fritz5.32 made in games that Fritz5.16 would not do and not only in positions when there is something to find. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.