Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: late move reductions (and another question)

Author: Gerd Isenberg

Date: 22:41:01 03/01/06

Go up one level in this thread


On March 01, 2006 at 19:52:09, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On March 01, 2006 at 18:25:24, Gerd Isenberg wrote:
>
>>What about an additional boolean (0..1) history table dimension,
>>true if Parent is first child of grandparent?
>
>Have not thought about it, to be honest.  But isn't that recursive?  i.e. for
>ply=3 that would be true for first move, false otherwise, but then at ply=4
>wouldn't the same thing happen recursively???

during the pv.

>
>Or maybe after 1:15 of lecturing on virtual memory page replacement, my head's a
>bit foggy?  :)

I thought on distinguishing late cutoffs at "expected cut-nodes" versus
"unexpected" cutoffs at all-nodes...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.