Author: Tony Werten
Date: 14:07:23 03/03/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 2006 at 16:22:41, Tord Romstad wrote: >On March 03, 2006 at 16:08:50, Tony Werten wrote: > >>Our thoughts are probably just a reflex reaction based on the bad experience >>from nonlocking hashtable sharing. > >In fact, I don't lock the hash table either. :-) > >I agree that I *should* lock the hash table, or use Bob's lockless hashing >trick. >So far, I have just been too lazy to implement it. I haven't noticed any bad >effects of non-locking hash table sharing so far, but of course this doesn't >mean that it hasn't happened. Bob's trick makes perfect sense with a rather small impact (performance and implementation wise), but it's less urgent with few processors and large memory. Tony PS I'm not sure how much longer I can sit here. Anybody had a vasectomy as well ? > >Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.