Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: comp vs comp or comp vs human ... but why not comp vs cc players?

Author: Robert Ericsson

Date: 01:15:22 04/27/99

Go up one level in this thread



AOn April 27, 1999 at 03:33:23, Harald Faber wrote:

>On April 26, 1999 at 12:16:07, Robert Ericsson wrote:
>
>>>>>>That's why I use 'watch' command in Fritz and
>>>>>>not cc analysis feature when looking through my own played games :-D
>>>>>
>>>>>And what do you do if you want an alternative move suggestion, based on the
>>>>>position?
>>>>
>>>>I'm not sure I understand what you mean? When using 'watch' command I can
>>>>see what Fritz thinks is the best way to go. And of course I look at other
>>>>interesting moves that there suggested in the post-mortem by me our by my
>>>>opponent.
>>>
>>>I assumed you use Fritz WATCH to find some tactical misses and need s.th. else
>>>for move proposals, e.g. Rebel, Hiarcs or MCP.
>>>Do you?
>>
>>Doesn't 'watch' command give proposals? At least I have four lines 'ticking'
>>in my right hand box of Fritz when using this command ;-)
>
>Correct, but they are still Fritzchens proposals... ;-)
>I'd prefer a mopre positional proposal...

Ahh... that's your point! Well, I myself think Rebel9 (I don't have R10) is
a good positional 'player'. At least far better then Fritz5 and Hiarcs6.
But usually I only want to check the tactics in my games :-)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.