Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Chesslab and Novag Opal get this wrong: Does your program get it right?

Author: Michael de la Maza

Date: 16:44:01 05/01/99


I was playing white against my portable Novag Opal and arrived at this position:

White: Qa7, Re1, Kg1, and pawns on h2, g2, f2, and e3
Black: Qb5, Nc4, Rd3, Kg8, and pawns on e4, f5, g5, and h7
White to move

This is clearly a won game for black, but to my amazement I was a able to draw
by three-fold repetition (1. Qe7 h6 2. Qe6+ Kg7 3. Qe7+ Kg6 4. Qe6+ Kg7 etc.)

I figured that Opal was just such a weak computer that it didn't see the many
black moves that preserve the win and instead settled for a draw because it
didn't want to lose a pawn or two.

So I checked with ChessLab (www.chesslab.com) and, amazingly, the best variation
that it gives is actually a win for WHITE!  Here it is:
1. Qe7  h6
2. Qe6+ Kg7
3. Qe7+ Kg6
4. Qe6+ Kh5
5. Qf7+ Kh4
6. g3+  Kg4
7. h3+  Kf3
8. Qh5+ g4
9. hxg4
and mate in two for WHITE

Two things stand out about this line: 1) There are several ways for black to win
but neither program found any good line for black and 2) The variation that
leads to mate for white seems so trivial that any program should be able to
avoid it.

I'm curious to know how easy other programs find this position.


The settings for the two programs were as follows:
Novag Opal: "Average of 120 seconds per move"
Chesslab: "Long Analysis"

Michael



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.