Author: James Robertson
Date: 14:23:38 05/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 1999 at 05:07:20, pete wrote: ><snip> >> >>Should the makers of these various Winboard engines start arguing that they can >>hang (and in this case beat) the commericals and start charging $50 for their >>engines, since they're better than Nimzo? Should I start analyzing my games with >>various Winboard engines instead of Nimzo2000? >> >>Roger > ><snip> > >I agree the best freeware programs are not much worse than the commercial ones. > >But the NIMZO case is special : actually there is a version nimzo2000a which >plays just as good as the original Nimzo2000, which is a very strong program >while the sold winboard engine just sucks ( for example varduz on ICC uses Just SUCKS??? Then how come my program has but one draw after about 30 games?? James 2000a >). > >I think probably the author is planning to make an internet connection for the >original program himself . What over reason is possible to offer something that >is worse than your best ? Or maybe he wanted to fool millenium :=) > >Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.