Author: Roger D Davis
Date: 20:45:25 05/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
As I understand it, Bionic and Voyager are both Crafty clones...I imagine Bob knows his program better than anyone else, and can improve it faster than anyone one else. As for WBNimzo...I see no reason whatsoever to throw good money at this thing, assuming this is the retail version. Anyone know? Perhaps it's been deliberately dumbed down (my speculation, not fact) to prevent people from attach it to email and sending it all over the world. Roger On May 03, 1999 at 04:14:19, Francesco Di Tolla wrote: >Nizmo2000 did surprise me in the Winboard result, but the score was actually >explained from the discussion about the different versions. [By the way is this >WBNizmo 2000 the version that runs in Millennium software? if yes this is a >crap] > >But what is even more suprising is the result of Bionic, which, as far as I >know, some month ago was playing better (or the same as) than crafty. Now we >have a newer version of Crafty but I don't see how this can justify such a big >difference in the results. > >comments? > >bye >Franz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.