Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 09:40:05 05/04/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 1999 at 11:26:29, KarinsDad wrote: >I was wondering how deeply most programs extended the search at a given ply for >check. > >I implemented singular extensions, check extensions, and capture extensions into >my code last night, but ran into the problem of check extensions potentially >expanding the extensions into near infinity. > >How many checks do most programs consider is enough when extending? > >Thanks, > >KarinsDad :) My program simply says "if the iterative deepener started this search with depth=D, don't extend beyond 2*D". This is a naive approach, and I'd also be interested in hearing what anyone else does. > >PS. Will, we realized that our nps is way off. We were compiling the code in >debug mode as opposed to optimized mode. So, our 100 knps went up to 209 knps. >Duh! 209knps!! What position? Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.