Author: Walter Koroljow
Date: 05:58:14 05/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 14, 1999 at 05:29:58, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >On May 14, 1999 at 05:24:20, Peter Hegger wrote: > >>Hello >>Let's say that today's best programs, Fritz, CM6000, junior etc.. are playing at >>the 2450 level at 40/2 when they've got hardware capable of knocking off .5M >>nps. I don't think this is too outlandish an assumption. >>If you double this speed 8 times over you arrive at 128M nps. This is in the >>same ballpark as this new proposed screamer of Hsu's which it is estimated will >>knock off 120M nps on a multi-processor platform. >>I've seen in other threads that doubling speed will increase performance >>anywhere from 30-70 points per doubling. For argument's sake and to split the >>difference I'll assume that 50 is likely pretty close. Using 2450 as the base >>this would translate into an elo of 2850 give or take a bit. >>Is it really possible that a machine which is stronger (marginally) rating wise >>than the world champion is right around the corner. Or am I missing something >>here in making this estimate? >>In any event I'd love to see Kasparov tackle this baby in a 40/2 24 game match. >>Bets anyone? :) >>Regards >>Peter > >Giving a program rating without actually having it play to earn that rating >against the human counterparts is wrong. If you get that estimated rating with >DB chip, then what was your rating for Deep Blue ? Precisely the point. Deepest Blue proved that ratings -at that very high level - do not go up at 30-70 points per doubling. In fact, I recall reading someone on the IBM team saying (I can't remember the reference) that at Deepest Blue levels they barely go up at all and that it is time to concentrate on evaluation functions, etc. Regards Walter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.