Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Q. about Rebel extensions

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 09:48:08 05/20/99

Go up one level in this thread


On May 20, 1999 at 06:01:29, Ed Schröder wrote:

>>Posted by Dave Gomboc on May 20, 1999 at 03:00:12:
>
>>>Extensions (remaining):  A number of the list of "Extensions on depth"
>>>is also tried in the tree. Here I use fractional increments of 1/4 ply. One
>>>idea is to push the hash table entries of best lines. In other words, if
>>>the current move is from the hash table and the move of the previous
>>>ply too then the depth is increased with 1/4 ply. Also some promotion
>>>extensions are tried which increment may vary on their importance.
>>
>>"Pushing the hash table" sounds interesting.  I have never heard of this being
>>done before!
>>
>>In "Search Control Methods in Deep Blue", a small (I think 1/4 ply) extension
>>was done if a move by the opponent was made possible by the last move of the
>>opponent (i.e. they are following some plan... and might be putting together
>>some kind of combination, even if you're not sure what it is yet).  They
>>referred to this as "influence", I think.  I do not remember if they
>>invented it or if it was cited from somewhere else.
>
>I am not sure if I understand you correctly. Say Nf3-e1 as an example, then
>extend new possible moves like Nd3, Nf2 and so on with 1/4 ply. Correct
>interpretation? Not a bad idea.

If Nf3-e1 was played on the last iteration, then Nd3 would get a small
extension, yes.  Was Nf2 a typo?  Oh, I see.  In positions where Ne1-d3 was
played, yes, Nd3-f2 would get a small extension too.  That's right.

I am thinking they invented this, I haven't heard about it before either.

>Ed Schroder

Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.