Author: blass uri
Date: 06:52:30 06/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 01, 1999 at 08:51:05, Bruce Cleaver wrote: >I think most readers do not believe Hsu, because they forget that not only is >the hardware greatly stronger than a micro, but the eval function is also >greatly stronger than a micro (as Dr. Hyatt has pointed out) because Hsu can do >all sorts of cool eval things for free in hardware. I do not think that the readers forget it. I think that they simply do not believe that the eval function of DB is stronger. I think that the reason is that they were not impressed by the public games of DB or DB Jr. Also, as Larry Kaufman has >pointed out, comp-comp results tend to be exaggerated compared to comp-human >results. > > > This brings up an interesting point - is it possible to fairly test a DB Jr. >with a micro? Setting both to a figure of X kn/sec doesn't cut it, because the >hardware eval function of DB Jr. is MUCH better than the micro's eval function - >even a highly developed one like Fritz or whatever....Any opinions?? a highly developed one like Fritz??? If you do the test of setting commercials to X kn/sec then I do not expect Fritz to have very good results. I think that Hiarcs7 or CM6000 are clearly better in this test. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.