Author: James Robertson
Date: 11:19:17 06/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 1999 at 04:17:30, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >Micheal, > >Hah,hah,hah,hah... NYUK,NYUK,NYUK. You are correct sir. Are you going to buy >Hiarcs 7.32 in order to have all of its features? You already own Rebel 10 and >like me seem happy with it. > >By the way, the margin of error for the 182 manually played CM6000 games was >plus 61 to minus 53 against opponents that were 200 points weaker. This does >not mean that CM6000 is 61 points stronger than reported or that it is 53 points >weaker. What it means is that we should have less confidence in the results. > >Don't be disappointed if CM6000 ends up in 5th or 6th place. CM6000 is a great >program but it is not used by Kasparov for his analysis. On the other hand, we >are not Kasparov. > >Keep on loving computer chess, > >Tim Frohlick CM6k is very close to the other top programs, so a GM would not notice the difference in strength (probably). But they would notice the horrible analyzing functions in CM6k. Also, they may just not like Dutch programs in American clothes! :\ James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.