Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 19:02:00 06/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 03, 1999 at 14:16:55, Steven Schwartz wrote: >On June 03, 1999 at 13:42:50, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>Will we be voting for a fixed number of moderators (e.g. 3) as in the first >>election, or for "all that are acceptable to us" as in the last election? >>Dave > >Each member will be able to vote for "all that are acceptable". >This is even more crucial now than before because whomever takes >4th place will serve as an alternate. >- Steve (ICD/Your Move) No, I think since there are three moderators that we should only vote 3 times. Someone will come in fourth whatever happens. This will take away from all those posts we read last election where they said they could not make up their mind, or that they were all good guys and voted for every single one. Which in my view counts as a none vote, cause they are choosing everyone. and since 1 vote is added to all by the same person, they might as well not have voted cause at the end that vote really means nothing. I remember last time you said that you would look into it and next time see if it could be changed so this is not done again. It is now next time.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.