Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 12:53:34 06/04/99
Go up one level in this thread
Of course $5 billion is a huge sum. But as a US taxpayer (though not a citizen) I see that US goverment spends much greater sums with much less possible return. Rest of discussion - via private e-mail, or we'll start to talk about politics here. Eugene On June 04, 1999 at 15:34:28, James B. Shearer wrote: >On June 03, 1999 at 21:05:53, Eugene Nalimov wrote: > >>All the physysist I talked with about it (and I have a lot of friends that are >>physysists in Russian Academy of Sciences) have other opinion. They thought that >>supercollider would be the beatiful and very helpful instrument. Unfortunately, >>they are not voting in the US Congress. > > Sure it would be nice to have if it were free. However as I recall >it was to have cost about 5 billion dollars. Did all your Russian physisist >friends claim this was the best way to spend $5000000000? > James B. Shearer
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.