Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 17:11:11 06/04/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 04, 1999 at 18:56:39, Dann Corbit wrote: >On June 04, 1999 at 18:51:00, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Why can't we have 6 moderators? All these people will be good moderators. I >>think one of the main problems is no-one can watch the Board all the time. >>Seems like more moderators would be a big advantage?! More chance of someone >>picking up a bad post before it gets too far. >Very possibly, you like them all fine but others do not. Some may feel strongly >that certain persons should not be moderator. Besides, I happen to know of at >least one who would rather play Russian Roulette with 3 bullets missing instead >of zero. >;-) > >You make a good point. I would like to expand it. Everyone here is a moderator >[or should be]. You see something offensive, you click on the moderators email >form and the matter is taken care of immediately. Hello Dann Sorry to have to inform you, Dann, but I sent a message to Harold Faber more than four days ago and still haven't received a response or any action.!! Mel Thousands of moderators are >*much* better than 3 or even 6.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.