Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 13:05:49 06/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 08, 1999 at 14:20:39, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Hi Dan: >It seems to me that the kernel of our differences in this isue -and in fact of >me with the rest of all omin ees- is that I put more importance in the fact that >people is meeting here to talk chess computer than in the fact that computer >chess is here waiting to be talked about by people. If I come here, of course it >is because chess computer interest me and with all probability that will be the >content of almost all my posts, but I would want to be at easy with the >likelihood that maybe another issue can appear in the thread or along the >conversation with a guy without thinking some moderator is evaluating that as a >sin that maybe should be deleted. It is not I am asking to add new items to >this site, but let people the freedom to do that if they like, knowing in >advance that those off topic issues never will be so much as endanger the >purpose of this place. Once I started a thread with Dgeordge Vidanovic about >phylosophy if I not recall badly and that made room to be acquanted much better >wiht him and many things very important followed from that. And why we just does >not pursued that talking trhough email? Because part of the fun were the >comments of another people here. We just did not want to narrow the potential >scope of the conversation. You see, for me the intercourse is more important >that the content of it. In fact, onmce the intercoruse is fluid, the content >become more interesting. I have not enriched my life discussing about hash >tables, BUT talking about many things with peple that casually is interested, >like me, in a degree, in hashs tables. >I hope I make my position cristal clear. >fernando Yes, but if you wanted to discuss philosophy, you can find a newsgroup for that. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.