Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 08:54:51 06/10/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 1999 at 21:09:09, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On June 09, 1999 at 19:21:19, KarinsDad wrote: > >>On June 09, 1999 at 19:13:43, Dave Gomboc wrote: >> >>> >>>So is a draw in the maximum number of moves or the minimum number of moves more >>>"perfect"? >>> >>>Dave >> >>Well, considering that there is a time control, I would think that maybe due to >>the massive hard disk lookup involved, that minimal number of moves would be >>preferable to larger number of moves for either wins or draws. >> >>We currently play a game with "imperfection" on both sides, so ALL 3, 4, and 5 >>piece legal positions are added to the tablebases. But if one side was playing >>"perfect", maybe some of those positions would not be needed. >> >>Who can say? This is all theoretical (and probably will remain so forever). >> >>KarinsDad :) > >If minimum, then here's a perfect game: > >1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Ng1 Ng8 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Ng1 Ng8 5. Nf3 and black claims a draw by >repetition, intending to play Nf6. > >Dave Black can claim the draw one move before, intending to play 4... Ng8 José.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.