Author: James Robertson
Date: 10:10:45 06/13/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 1999 at 11:38:09, Charles L. Williams wrote: >On June 12, 1999 at 14:33:42, James Robertson wrote: > >>These are some of the distressing things testers have said about my program. >>Does anybody else recieve emails with stuff like this in them? >> >>James >> >> >>"... that is great to analyze mistakes and other mystical things with JRCP." >> >>"Sometimes JRCP neglects the evolution of it's chessmen." >> >>"I can't believe my eyes [Rhg1??]. This is remembering the early days of >>computer chess." >> >>"There is certainly something wrong with King safety." >> >>"JRCP draws with LambChop. After analyzing the game, I saw JRCP gives stalemate >>in a total lost position. This is certainly a strange way to get a 1/2 point." >> >>"All other programs were playing Qxd8. YOUR program plays Kxd8, somewhat >>unexpectedly." >> >>"It seems JRCP does not know about King safety." >> >>"Today I have prepared a testsuite from blunder-games of JRCP." >> >>"> Big bug in King safety fixed. >> >>Is it?" > > >Some of these are useful, some useless, some written by jerks. The problem is >trying to sort it all out. > > >Chuck They are _all_ useful. :) James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.