Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 13:48:00 06/20/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 20, 1999 at 13:12:35, blass uri wrote: > >On June 20, 1999 at 11:02:25, Dave Gomboc wrote: > ><snipped> >>IMO, tiebreak is a sucky way to resolve this stuff in general. No reason why >>they can't play g/30, then g/5 to decide. >> >>Dave > >There is a reason for not doing it because we are interested in the best in >tournament time copntrol and not in the best in fast games. > >Uri This is a legitimate point of view, though it's not mine. The system we have is way better than the ridiculous knockout stuff, though. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.