Author: José Berdiñas Bonefua
Date: 16:10:39 06/20/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 20, 1999 at 17:57:55, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On June 20, 1999 at 16:52:49, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On June 20, 1999 at 15:36:09, blass uri wrote: >> >>>I do not agree >>>shredder is probably not worse than the other and it is going to become >>>commercial. >> >>Shredder has been commercial for some time already. Shredder 2.0 is even rated >>on the SSDF list, though no results are available for Shredder 3.0 (yet). >Hello! > >Of course we know the strength of Shredder3, Zarkov, Wchess, Genius6, Rebel10 >and CStalII, but we are forbidden to publish the results. We have played several >hundred games with them. > Shredder 3 full version do no have prohibition to publish results !!! I only can read this in Shredder 3 engine for Genius 6. >Regards Bertil SSDF > >>>The result proved that software is more important then hardware(some programs >>>with good hardware scored 50% or even less than it. >>> >>>The prediction that there is no chance for a micro to be the world champion was >>>clearly wrong. >>> >>>I think that it may be better if programmers concentrate on improving the >>>software instead of improving the hardware. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.