Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Super GM Result for Computers!!

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 08:50:22 06/22/99

Go up one level in this thread


On June 22, 1999 at 11:09:51, Harald Faber wrote:
[snip]
>OK, so the final decisive question: Are chess programs allowed to participate,
>and if so under which conditions, in "normal" human tournaments?
To my way of thinking, even that condition is not strictly necessary.  It
should, however, be a real tournament of some kind with something significant at
stake.  Ed's contests with Rebel will qualify in my opinion.  The reason I think
that there has to be a condition like this is that people may play very
differently when there is nothing at stake.  As an example, you may have a
Winboard program running on the internet.  A GM plays 20 games against it and
loses 12.  But it turns out, she was really just testing out a new opening and
looking for tactical holes which your computer located.  So the experiment was
not testing what you thought at all.  When there is something at stake, and the
person's reputation is on the line, they are much more likely to try their
hardest to win.

Once 30 games have been played by a single program on known hardware under these
conditions, I think all reasonable doubt will have been removed for that
program.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.