Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 18:42:51 06/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 1999 at 06:25:35, Shep wrote: >On June 22, 1999 at 03:46:52, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >>>I looked on your site, but could not find your settings you are using for CM6K. >>>I assume the standards settings, but what size hash tables and what is selective >>>search set on >>> >>>Thanks >> >>I would like to add I think using any other setting than the standards ones, >>with SS=10 and 16 meg hash table settings would greatly reduce the strength of >>CM6K. CM6555 settings have not been tested much. And Johann stated that the >>above settings I said are the strongest for CM6K. >> >>So any modified setting eg; CM5555 is unfair in my opinion to be used for CM6K. >> >>I hope you followed Johann's settings and not other ones. > >You have things mixed up a bit. > >To clarify: > >CM 6000 is playing with its standard settings, except that selectivity is set to >10 instead of 6. > >CM 5555 (*not* CM 6555!) is a modified CM 5500 (*not* CM 6000) personality. >It plays better than 5500 IMO. It has performed extraordinarily well in almost >100 games at 40/120 on my site, that's why I still use it, though CM 5500 is >already quite old. > >Hash size is 64 MB for both CMs. I have not yet checked if 128 MB will help or >harm, probably neither. > >--- >Shep Hi Shep, Johann stated that 16MB hash size was more than enough for 40/2hrs game. The SSDF tested Chessmaster`s games at the 16MB hash size. Perhaps too much hash size could slow the speed down too much! Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.