Author: blass uri
Date: 21:24:35 06/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 1999 at 23:27:07, Brett Clark wrote: >On June 22, 1999 at 14:16:55, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On June 22, 1999 at 13:31:12, Laurence Chen wrote: >> >> >>>it seems that Hiarcs gets >>>the advantage. So from a statistical point of view, test running in a single >>>computer are not reliable. >> >>It is also possible that tests that are done with an autoplayer are not reliable >>and people who use 2 computer should try to reproduce the games manually. >>I am simply not sure if the autoplayer do not cause Hiarcs to play weaker. >> >>I read that Ed discovered that the autoplayer caused Mchess8 to do stupid errors >>in games against Rebel10 and I simply stopped to trust the autoplayer after I >>read it. >> >>Uri > >In engine vs. engine matches, Hiarcs 7.32 will destroy Fritz 5.32 most of the >time. Hiarcs saves its hash tables between moves, Fritz starts from scratch at >the beginning of each move. This in essence gives Hiarcs the equivalent of >pondering in the engine vs. engine matches. In competition between the two >programs on separate machines, I believe that there is not much difference >between the two, maybe Hiarcs is a bit stronger. I know it but I do not think that it is so important pentium90 against p200 is a bigger advantage and the ssdf results dhow that the rating difference is less than 100 points even in this case. The expected result between equal program should not change dramatically. I understand changing from 4:4 to 4.5:3.5 but not a big change. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.