Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: fractional extensions

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 17:51:59 06/23/99

Go up one level in this thread


On June 23, 1999 at 18:26:19, William Bryant wrote:

>
>>IE the idea is that it takes two 3/4 ply extensions before you really extend
>>anything.  And when you think of it, what this means is that the first 3/4
>>ply extension is ineffective, but the next three of them extend the search
>>by one ply.  Then the 5th does nothing, but the next three extend by one
>>ply:
>>
>>1000  1075 [no change]  1150 [1 extra]  1225 [2 extra] 1300 [ 3 extra] 1375
>>[no change again] and so forth...
>>
>>
>>This isn't new at all...  We were doing this in the 1970's...
>
>So, if you are in check at the same node that generates an additional 3/4 ply
>extension, that node gets extended a full 2 plies -- or does the no more than
>1 ply at a time rule always apply -- and the extras just roll over to the
>next deeper node?
>
>William
>wbryant@ix.netcom.com


I _never_ add more than 1 ply at any ply.  I may add exactly 1 ply which means
that the depth doesn't change when I recursively call search.  But I never go
beyond 1 ply at any level in the tree... otherwise a non-terminating search can
happen...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.