Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hiarcs7.32 DISGRACED Fritz5.32 in 20 games under tournaments controls!

Author: Mark Young

Date: 12:23:49 06/27/99

Go up one level in this thread


On June 27, 1999 at 14:56:41, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote:

>
>On June 27, 1999 at 13:58:21, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>On June 27, 1999 at 05:55:46, blass uri wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>On June 27, 1999 at 04:29:27, Micheal Cummings wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>On June 27, 1999 at 04:16:39, blass uri wrote:
>>><snipped>
>>>>Hi Uri
>>>>
>>>>From what I gather, most of the games played between Fritz and Hiarcs have been
>>>>played on one computer. Now from most games I have played with one machine a
>>>>program is always disadvantaged.
>>>>
>>>>And with such large hash tables being used, the time to clear them would take
>>>>time.
>>>Hi Michael
>>>
>>>The time to clear big hash tables is not more than few seconds and it is not
>>>significant at tournament time control.
>>>Hiarcs has an advantage by the fact it can save time by not clearing the hash
>>>tables but I do not think that it is a big advantage.
>>
>>I will give fritz 5 all the hash it wants 256mb. I know it will not help Fritz 5
>>or Fritz 5.32 over using 128mb. I will use it because
>______________________________________________________
>Are you aware that Tania is giving Fritz only 44 mb at 40/150? And using only
>one computer?
>_______________________________________________________
>

Yes, and what about it, if you think giving Fritz more hash would of changed the
results of the match you are wrong. This hash thing with Fritz is old news to
many of us on CCC. I have done testing to see how giving fritz hugh hash table
affected its elo. There was little change.... Fritz with 256mb hash is not super
Fritz over Fritz with 44mb hash.


>perception is everything,
>>and it they think this will make Fritz 5 and Fritz 5.32 into superman so be it.
>>
>>There is no big advantage in clearing or not clearing the hash tables, if people
>>think this alone can account for Hiarcs7.32 winning some of the matches, they
>>are full of it, the winning percentage is too big. I am left with the only
>>conclusion, Hiarcs7.32 is good.
>>
>>>
>>>I do not think that thesre should be a big difference between one computer and
>>>two computers unless there is a bug in one of these systems.
>>>
>>>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.