Author: Larry Applebaum
Date: 15:28:25 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 1999 at 17:42:45, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >Hello, > >in the last week I wrote here that Crafty 16.10 (Corbit Version) make 128.000 >NPS (01. a4 e5, 02. a5 ..., WinBoard 4.0.2, time 40 moves in 40 minutes, 24/8 MB >for HT, AMD K6-2 400 MHz). > >I testet this under the AMD K6-3 450 MHz and see that Crafty 16.10 make 185.000 >NPS (Celeron 450 MHz (300) make 188.000 NPS, Pentium III 450 MHz make 180.000). > >I think for Pentium optimation is this a good result for AMD. > >Thanks Bob for Crafty another and thanks Dann. > >Dann, you must Crafty optimize for AMD K6-3 not for Pentium :-)) Let me toss my two cents worth in here... The Microsoft C compilers only optimize with Intel chips as targets and then only in a general way. The only way I know of to optimize for AMD chips is hand-crafted assembler. Any other opinions welcome. Larry > >Kind regards >Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.