Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 19:00:02 06/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 1999 at 12:50:49, Sune Larsson wrote: >On June 29, 1999 at 12:19:17, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On June 29, 1999 at 10:46:35, Sune Larsson wrote: >> >>>I have followed the discussion of various Hash-Tablesettings with great >>>interest. There seems to be an agreement(?) in the fact that Hiarcs 7.32 needs >>>about 1/10 of the Hash-Tables needed by Fritz 5.32. So let´s see! >>> >>>PII-400 MhZ 128 MB RAM >>> >>>HashTables: Fritz 5.32 60MB Hiarcs 7.32 6 MB >>> >>>Books: Fritz 5.32 - F5-book Hiarcs 7.32 - Hiarcs-book >>> >>>Time: 60 minutes for the whole game >>> >>> >>>RESULTS: Fritz 5.32-Hiarcs 7.32 13,5-6,5 >>> >>> >>>F - H 1 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 0 0 1 ½ 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 = 13,5-6,5 >>> >>> Comments ? >>> >>>Greetings >>>Sune >> >>Hello Sune, >>I have been getting similiar results all along. I have played 76 games at >>Game/15 between Hiarcs7.32 vs Fritz 5.32 so far. The results are in favor of >>Fritz by 46.5 to 29.5. They were played with auto232 with Fritz 5.32 on a >>Pentium 333 with 64 M hash tables and Hiarcs was on a K6-2-400. I don't >>remember the hash setting for Hiarcs but it was the minimum it would allow using >>auto232. I think the GUI is set up for Fritz and the required hash tables for >>auto232 play may be high for Hiarcs. I have also played 200 games at game/5 min >>with the score in favor of Fritz 106.5 to 93.5. I played 200 game/5min vs >>Junior 5.0 and Hiarcs 7.32. Junior 5.0 won 100.5 to 99.5. I have played 10 >>"Long" games with Fritz leading so far 8 to 2. So, in my auto232 testing, >>Hiarcs has not won a single time control. I am continuing the "Long" games now >>playing 40/2hrs & 20/1hr with no sudden death. The required hash settings for >>this time control is 44 Meg. Any of these games are available for examination >>to anyone who request them. >>Jim Walker > > >And to your results I can add the following games Hiarcs 7.32-Fritz 5.32, >autoplayed on a PII-400 MhZ 128MB RAM. H-F > >1) 10'-games 44MB Hash each. Fritz' Powerbooks for both players. 5-5 > >2) 10'-games 44MB Hash each. Kingsgambitbook for both players. 6-4 > >3) 10'-games 44MB Hash each. Nunn-test. 10-10 > >4) 30'-games 44MB Hash each. Fritz' Powerbooks for both players. 16,5-13,5 > > >I,m still confused concerning the best Hash-Table value for Hiarcs 7.32. >The performance with 6 MB Hash-Tables was very poor. Or maybe there is >something really fishy about Hiarcs' book! > >Sune Hello Sune, I'd like to personally welcome you to the Hiarcs Confusion Club. It's always nice to greet new members. Yes, there is much confusion which all began with the wrong manual in Hiarcs from ConfusionBase, err, I mean, Chessbase. Regards, Mel, President of the Hiarcs 7.32 Confusion Club.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.