Author: Shep
Date: 08:41:28 07/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 1999 at 08:58:17, blass uri wrote: > >On July 14, 1999 at 08:43:48, Tania Devora wrote: > ><snipped> >>Im not agree with you shep, Chess Tiger is not more stronger than Hiarcs7.32 > >shep did not say that Chess tiger is stronger then Hiarcs7.32 >The fact that he wrote chess tiger before Hiarcs proves nothing because he said >in his post >"in no particular order" Exactly. Besides, the number of games I played on machines faster than 233 Mhz is still too small to make such assertions (less than 15 with each program). On the 400 Mhz systems, Tiger 11.5 played about as strong as Hiarcs 7.0 (which is weaker than 7.32). On the 550 MHz systems, both Tiger 11.5 and Hiarcs 7.32 are still undefeated (but they will play each other in 2-3 days if my schedule allows). --- Shep
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.