Author: Charles Unruh
Date: 13:16:27 07/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 1999 at 09:33:25, Amir Ban wrote: >>>alone and must get the opinion of the third moderator. >>> >>>This was my understanding of the rules, and they were followed with no >>>exceptions that I can remember. >>> >>>It doesn't seem the present moderators have worked out any such procedures, or >>>at least that's my impression from the posts in this thread. If they were >>>following the procedures set above, I would consider Bruce's action to be >>>illegal, since he should have assumed that Fernando, by posting what he did, >>>disagrees with him, and he had to resort to majority vote. >>> >>>I think Bruce showed very poor judgement here. His action would not deserve much >>>comment against an ordinary member, and would probably be perfectly justified, >>>but for the moderators to start censoring each other does not make sense, for >>>reasons that have nothing to do with the charter. What we have now can be called >>>a constitutional crisis. >>> >>>Experience shows that the post of moderator needs quite a bit of talent for >>>politics and diplomacy. I hope the voters will remember this next time. >>> >>>Amir >> >>Your comments show a lack of insight and/or thought, and perhaps some >>vindictiveness. That is self-evident to the casual reader, so no argument is >>required. >> > >I don't even know from which angle you are attacking my opinion, so it can't be >self-evident. > >Why vindictiveness ? I think that part at least needs justification. > > >>I am furthermore disappointed that, after so long an absence, you choose to post >>on such an insubstantial matter. > >I don't consider this matter insubstantial. > > >> Really disappointing. >> >>Will > >I'm not thrilled to read your post either. > >Amir You tell him who's boss Amir!!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.