Author: Paul Richards
Date: 08:29:26 07/26/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 1999 at 11:27:01, Paul Richards wrote: >On July 25, 1999 at 22:54:16, Charles Milton Ling wrote: > >>This a rather cheeky suggestion, I must say right away. But this game is at a >>turning point, the extremely exciting (cuts both ways) 18. ... f5 having been >>proposed and endorsed by strong humans. A position full of tactical >>possibilities is in the offing. Who better to analyze it than... >>I really feel that if Bob's program (on his exceedingly powerful machine) likes >>18. ... f5, GK is in trouble. If it doesn't, we (The World) could still change >>course. >>Could you give us half an hour or so? Please? >>Charley > >I can do as well running a machine overnight, but where Dr. Hyatt's machine >would come in *very* handy is the use of the 5-man tablebases for the endgame. Come to think of it what might be even more helpful is to have Dr. Hyatt ask Roman for his analysis of the position. ;) Computers are quite good at tactics, but they're nothing compared to a strong human GM given a lot of time to analyze, especially if he can talk it over with other grandmasters.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.