Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:00:29 07/26/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 1999 at 17:41:30, Dave Gomboc wrote: [snip] >IMHO: Legitimate posts were deleted during the last moderation period -- on more >than one occasion. Participants of CCC should have the freedom to access at >least some information about posts that were deleted against the author's >wishes. Christophe's suggestion, if not overly burdensome to site organizers, >should be implemented. Disagree. I think if you have a post cut and disagree, then go post it on news:rec.games.chess.computer and have a shouting match over there. Is anything we have to say really so valuable that the world can't get along without it? Even if the best post I have ever written gets cut, I think that I should just live with it. I could always post it somewhere else if I got my bun in a knott over it. If anything does get removed, it is sure to be for a good reason. Why should anyone get personally insulted over such a thing? I don't think anyone should throw a tantrum if their post is cut. OTOH, I don't see why they can't say: SUBJ: Removed post My post titled "Why poster <x> is an ignorant puke" was cut. Read all about it on news:rec.games.chess.computer. Then, anyone who wants to piss into the fire can dash over there and scream their lungs out about it. [FCOL]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.