Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Cray Blitz - Ratings of the past false? Or are Current ones false ??

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 21:17:44 07/26/99

Go up one level in this thread


On July 26, 1999 at 20:03:50, Mark Young wrote:

>On July 26, 1999 at 19:23:01, John Wentworth wrote:
>
>>After Cray Blitz won the 1983 World Computer Chess championship it's rating was
>>2153. The Cray supercomputer from that time is still much faster than today's
>>PC's ever dreamed of being yet Cray Blitz's rating was much lower than todays PC
>>programs. In another post here, Robert Hyatt mentioned that Cray Blitz would
>>beat Crafty based on hardware. So I guess my conclusion here is that either the
>>rating of 2153 back in 1983 for Cray Blitz was way off or the estimated rating
>>of Crafty and other current PC's are way off. In my opinion, Cray Blitz running
>>on a Cray Supercomputer would still blow away any of the current programs
>>running on any PC today. I guess I have to think that the rating of 2153 was WAY
>>off. Any other opinions?
>
>Bob can correct me if I am wrong, but was not this rating based on games played
>against humans, or computers that had ratings playing humans. If I remember
>right, I think there was a prize for the first computer to achive and hold a
>master rating playing humans of 2200 which I think Belle won. So I think the
>rating may be pretty close to accurate because of this fact.

Actually it was based on neither.  Ken had a rating program...  He computed the
rating of Belle at 2200 based on it's USCF rating at the time of 2208.  Most
of the rest were assumed to be 2000, for no particular reason.  The numbers in
the crosstable are just TPR numbers...

another case of taking a "rating estimate" as "the absolute rating"...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.