Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Poor Doctor!! Humiliating victory by Hiarcs 7.32 in 20 games. ( pgn)

Author: Peter Kappler

Date: 11:34:06 08/03/99

Go up one level in this thread


On August 03, 1999 at 04:28:04, Terry Ripple wrote:

>On August 02, 1999 at 15:08:49, Peter Kappler wrote:
>
>>On August 02, 1999 at 09:09:24, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On August 02, 1999 at 04:11:24, Tania Devora wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hi! I made another tournament between the Super Strong Hiarcs 7.32 and Doctor3.0
>>>>Poor Doctor! Hiarcs won by the incredible 18-2!
>>>>Only 4 draws, the rest is Hiarcs victories.
>>>>
>>>>Machine used : K6-II 350 Mhz with 128 ram, 44 MB for each program,
>>>>Time used is : G\30 Semi Blitz.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Enjoy the games!
>>>>
>>>>And give me your opinion about the games!
>>>>
>>>>Thanks!
>>>>
>>>
>>>Why continue to post flawed games?  (two programs on one computer).  IE
>>>this is about as valid as doing bacterial cultures outdoors on a city street.
>>>Interesting, but not valid.
>>>
>>>
>>>computer testing using only one computer is simply worthless.  Except for
>>>debugging...
>>>
>>
>>Bob,
>>
>>I don't understand how single computer testing can be "simply worthless".  As
>>long as both engines don't ponder, I think you should get results that are
>>similar to 2-computer testing.
>>
>>I've heard the discussions about how not being able to ponder can slightly
>>affect a program's time management, but I can't believe that this can completely
>>invalidate the result of a long match.
>>
>>Even if there are some small side-effects from single-computer tesing, the
>>impact should be roughly the same for both engines, right?
>>
>>Maybe somebody with 2 machines and some spare time could run a long match with
>>both configurations and help to shed some light on this issue?
>>
>>--Peter
>----------
>Hi Peter,
>  Mark Young claims that he played hundreds of games using both methods of a
>single computer and also using two computers to run a series of matches and that
>his results were very close in both cases!
>
>Regards,Terry


Hi Terry,

Thanks for the info.  I'm happy to see that this "myth" is finally being
debunked.

--Pete









This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.