Author: KarinsDad
Date: 13:04:14 08/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 25, 1999 at 14:50:34, Bruce Moreland wrote: [snip] >> >>Do you really think that something like this that is undocumented and cannot be >>turned off could be a feature? That seems like a very improbable scenario >>(unless as you state as a joke). It could be a conscious design decision to >>leave it as an uncorrected bug due either to a lack of desire or a major effort >>required to correct it. But a feature? > >Programs are full of unintended behaviors, which the programmer might consider >to be cool, possibly in opposition to some of his users. > >bruce I guess we are just talking semantics on the word feature here. By feature, I mean an intended feature, something that was designed in for a reason. I do not mean implementation or unintended behaviors which of course could be just about anything. I doubt this is an intended feature. It could quite possible be an uncorrected bug or an unintended (and even acceptable due to infrequency) behavior. KarinsDad :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.