Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: And the reason to purchase CSTal is what again?To Thorsten Czub

Author: J. Wesley Cleveland

Date: 09:57:47 08/26/99

Go up one level in this thread


On August 24, 1999 at 17:23:49, KarinsDad wrote:

>On August 24, 1999 at 16:52:40, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>
>[snip]
>>
>>I can't believe this is still going on.
>
>Yes, it is getting kind of old.
>
>>
>>Overstepping the time control can be a bug or a feature depending upon why the
>>program does it.  This problem was probably originally a bug, although it is
>>difficult to know for certain, and when it was discovered it may have been left
>>in as an uncorrected bug, or deemed to be a feature, perhaps with a laugh.
>
>Do you really think that something like this that is undocumented and cannot be
>turned off could be a feature? That seems like a very improbable scenario
>(unless as you state as a joke). It could be a conscious design decision to
>leave it as an uncorrected bug due either to a lack of desire or a major effort
>required to correct it. But a feature?

A bug is often (and ironically) defined as an undocumented feature.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.